4 ms·
I don't think anyone's concerned about IM vs. IN as they are mRNA vs. DNA. The boosters deliver double stranded helix straight to the nucleus like a Windows upd
by jart 5y ago
I don't think anyone's concerned about IM vs. IN as they are mRNA vs. DNA. The boosters deliver double stranded helix straight to the nucleus like a Windows update. You'd have to pull an Apocalypse Now to roll that back. GM people nobody panics but GM organic food and everyone loses their minds.
- fshbbdssbbgdd 5y agoI thought the boosters just have mRNA strands like the original mRNA vaccines do? I haven’t heard anything about them using CRISPR or otherwise editing the human genome. Would be neat but it seems like pharma companies charge a million dollars for that kind of treatment.
- empthought 5y agoYou don’t know how vaccines or viruses work, do you?
- jart 5y agoI know how code works and that DNA is code.
- empthought 5y agoEvery viral vaccine works this way, though. Because every virus works this way.
- jart 5y agoDon't most viruses just deliver mRNA that tells the cell to make more viruseses? I thought only a few, like herpes, deliver dna. That's why it can't be cured. DNA vaccines used to be commonly used on dogs and livestock to prevent things like rabies iiuc. It wasn't until these jensson booster shots that I've seen them being given to people on a large scale. Also there's a big difference when the mRNA and DNA code is emerging organically and when it's being engineering in labs.
- empthought 5y agoDNA viruses include chickenpox, whose massively successful vaccine is an attenuated virus which of course delivers “double strand helix right to your nucleus.” (And of course smallpox was a DNA virus as well.) Your appeal to nature fallacy is not worthy of a response.
- jart 5y agoSo you're saying the booster shots that deliver engineered dna via viral vectors are ok because herpes and smallpox do it too?