> I don't care whether the argument is yours or the article's, I'm addressing the argument Sure, by baselessly asserting that I, or Gramsci, >>decide what the

> I don't care whether the argument is yours or the article's, I'm addressing the argument Sure, by baselessly asserting that I, or Gramsci, >>decide what the correct beliefs are and the fact that other people don't have those beliefs is evidence of their coercion. Have I missed something? You wrote that "[i]t's very tricky to tell people that their desires, beliefs, culture, and religion are merely ruses to further domination", which suggests that I, or Gramsci, make that argument. I don't think I did; he doesn't seem to be. Should I infer that the three Fs outlined again and again in the article are in fact the desires, beliefs, culture, and religion of the people being oppressed?