3 ms·
I believe the system was adopted in the old days with very high interest rates (~10% was common) - landlords could easily expect to make enough return. It's ac
by yongjik 5y ago
I believe the system was adopted in the old days with very high interest rates (~10% was common) - landlords could easily expect to make enough return.
It's actually greatly favorable to landlords. Just think about what happens when one side is out of money. Under the monthly rent system, landlords can't get any more money until they evict the renter (which is a lot of hassle, anywhere in the world). Under the "jeonse" system, if the landlord becomes bankrupt, the renter is suddenly out of a large portion of their total wealth, and will be evicted by the new owner - without any money to find the next place.
(There are insurances to protect renters but the risk is still there.)
- chrischen 5y agoWould the new landlord inherit the liabilities of the house?
- yongjik 5y agoNot an expert, but I think there's a good chance the renter will lose money. When this happens, the landlord usually has more debt than the house is worth, so the renter has to compete with other lenders. (There's some legal protection, but I don't think it's bulletproof.)
- KptMarchewa 5y agoThe nice option world be to guarantee in law that renter gets the property as debt.