3 ms·
I understand where Corin is coming from but his well-meaning advice completely misses the potential. The question "Explain why Justin Bieber is popular" and th
by WordSkill 15y ago
I understand where Corin is coming from but his well-meaning advice completely misses the potential. The question "Explain why Justin Bieber is popular" and the answer "because teenage girls exist" are both BRILLIANT - the fact that Corin can't see the point of them doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with him, it just means that he is out of tune with the type of humor that most normal people enjoy.
A site like this is a novelty, potentially an extremely popular one. It will never be a storehouse of proper knowledge, like a sort of mini-StackExchange, full of the sort of things that Corin might consider "worthwhile" - think logically, what would be the point of "reaching out" to Paul Graham and other worthies ... for single sentence answers!
Seriously, this thing's true destiny is to be a dynamic stage for funny thoughts and funnier answers, and in that it has tremendous potential, tremendous value.
My advice would to look beyond the constraints of your own idea of what 1sentence will be, ease off on deleting answers, let your users lead the way and ignore the advice of techies who can't see the simple beauty of your idea - these are the type of people who orignally wrote off Twitter with grand, huffy statements about not wanting to know what other people were having for breakfast, completely failing to realize that something important was shifting in how people communicate.
Well done.
- diesellaws 15y agoThank you so much. I literally put this together in a few days and didn't think much of it so I am happy it's been received so well. The simplicity is what makes this work, and all your points are spot on. In terms of the deletion, that was a pure human error - apologies. I am surprised that even with open posting that most of the sentences were actually quite genuine. I am also surprised to see the responses are equally as genuine: http://1sentence.com/in-one-sentence-explain-programming/ http://1sentence.com/in-one-sentence-explain-programming/ There are some brilliant explanations on the website, and moving forward into a 'logged in' posting model would be the next step if I were to take it further - not sure as of yet. The users are definitely leading the way, and it's impressive to see - I will be watching closely the next few days to see where to take it. Thanks again for your great insight and activity on 1Sentence - very much appreciated. Diesel
- corin_ 15y agoI know you weren't making this connection directly for me, but just for the record I have actually been a big fan of Twitter for quite a while ;) I do see your points, but and I'm not saying my suggestions would make it a more popular site, or give it a better chance of making money, or a better chance of lasting longer. Simply that it would make it a site that I would enjoy more. And obviously I can see that my Bieber example was humour, and my point wasn't disagreeing with that, simply that a site for of actually insightful answers would, to me and to many others (not saying the majority) would be far more interesting, than a site full of random humoour. Would it be a waste to get pg to write just a sentence? Perhaps, but if so that means I have picked a bad example. I've seen many examples in the past of something quite complex being explained in an easy-to-understand one seentence way, which would have left me wanting a lot more had it been in my area of expertise, but in fact I much enjoyed. Here's an example, the P = NP problem. Sure, some people will enjoy reading pages and pages about this, but others not so much. A well-worded one sentance on why people care about it could therefore be interesting. Add that to many other topics, and essentially you're building a database that lets people learn a very little about a wide range of areas. What was the actual logic behind schrodinger's cat, how do birds fly, why is moore's law the case? I would enjoy browsing through that, I think. And, hopefully, some of them would be "I already knew that", some would be "I don't really care", some "that's quite interesting" and some "hmm, I need to go find out more about this". So really I wasn't trying to slightly alter this concept, I was pitching a totally differeent purpose of an almost identical website, that in my very subjective view would be better.