4 ms·
> consider that the whole "big oil lobbies governments" thing flies right in the face of the "democracy is the voice of the people" argument I don't think it d
by Hermitian909 5y ago
> consider that the whole "big oil lobbies governments" thing flies right in the face of the "democracy is the voice of the people" argument
I don't think it does. An important part of the lobbying is that we know oil companies are attempting to intentionally deceive politicians and the public about the negative effects of their industry and the positive effects of competitors. That deception is the point at play, the voice of the people can be misinformed.
> If people collectively don't care to fight back at a legislative level against socialized costs, wouldn't that logically mean they're the ones ultimately responsible for their own predicament?
This reads a lot to me like blaming the victim of a scam for being scammed. I've met quite a few climate skeptics in my day regurgitating oil lobbying talking points that were known to be false when published. I don't blame them for not fully comprehending the science behind climate change, I blame those oil companies are knowingly misinforming them.
- lhorie 5y agoOf course big oil has its share of immorality, but it's not like we never knew that poisonous smoke comes out of the back of our cars, right? Again, going back to forests and trees, one could also say the sugar industry is deceptive, or that big tech is, or that big telecom is, etc. So clearly there's a pattern, and companies are all run by people, who are motivated by accumulation of wealth. In other words, the negative factors of the system are intrinsically a part of the system, because greed is, for better or for worse, built into it (it's quite literally the driving force for capitalist economic activity). What I'm saying is that it doesn't really matter whether "companies lying" or "blaming the victim" is the "correct" position, the crude reality is simply that dishonest things happen as a direct negative side effect of a core principle that we as a society agreed to adopt. Pragmatically speaking, the question then becomes one of: a) what can I personally do to "surgically remove" the negative side effects of this core principle, b) if I can't, to what extent do I "care" in the dilemma between participating in a rotten system vs selfishly enjoying my life or, c) when all hope is lost, how do I take cover when shit inevitably hits the fan It's my impression that most people have lost hope on a), are in denial about b)[0] and have no clue about c). [0] https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/upton_sinclair_138285 https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/upton_sinclair_138285