4 ms·

I'd agree if San Francisco was full, but it's possible to build up and increase density so people can live close to their jobs. People per square mile: San Fra

• toomuchtodo 5y ago
  Those jobs can be remote, and it is cheaper to encourage employers economically to support remote work than to reshape entire geographies with housing. Speaking of Manhattan: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/01/nyregion/manhattan-vacant-office-space-real-estate.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/01/nyregion/manhattan-vacant... (Office Vacancies Soar in New York, a Dire Sign for the City’s Recovery; Nearly 19 percent of all office space in Manhattan has no tenants — the highest on record — as companies shed leases and embrace remote work.) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-05/even-before-covid-2-600-people-a-week-were-leaving-new-york-city https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-05/even-befo... (Even Before Covid 2,600 People a Week Were Leaving New York City)
• MichaelZuo 5y ago
  People in SF simply aren’t willing to pay that much for the shoe box condos/apartments necessary to reach manhattan density. That’s what the market is signalling. Because of course even the most die hard nimby would likely take a 8 figure buyout offer for their 7 figure home. If the developer could afford that and still profit, i.e. if they could then sell the units at thousands of dollars per square foot. If demand ever reaches that high then the market will move to a new equilibrium.
  • ChrisLTD 5y ago
    You can have large apartments in tall buildings. There just aren't enough high rise buildings in SF.