6 ms·
> which means the rise of Linux desktop or Fediverse platforms, and that's gonna be a while, but not impossible. I like to hope you're right, but I don't belie
by zelon88 5y ago
> which means the rise of Linux desktop or Fediverse platforms, and that's gonna be a while, but not impossible.
I like to hope you're right, but I don't believe you are.
Most people don't want to learn more about tech. They just want tech to be intuitive enough to pick up and use.
The mobile market appeared because Windows is too big and cumbersome. That's why people advertised it as a skill on their resume. It isn't fun. Windows is a chore to most people.
Nobody puts "experienced Android user" on their resume because it is expected that just by being alive you should be capable of using every function of an Android device. Very little functionality is abstracted away into 20 year old UI's or shell commands. There is a button for everything, and the button makes sense.
So if Windows didn't stand a chance, there is absolutely zero chance Linux will catch on at the scale it needs to for your post to come true.
- EamonnMR 5y agoThe reason you don't list android user on your resume is that it's very difficult to use android (or iOS) for anything beyond passive consumption of content which is not something employers want.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Ekaros 5y agoAlso I think Windows/Office is kinda left-over from 20-30 years back when it wasn't fully standard knowledge... So it's entirely meaningless buzzword used to fill up CVs...
- selfhoster11 5y agoIgnoring the fact that Android puts its buttons in basically arbitrary places, the fact is that it's just not a very useful platform for more complex tasks. It can do less, so there's not much to master. Windows and Linux can do more, so there is more to master because they allow more complicated interactions between things inside the computer. In other words, listing an OS on your resume means that you are sort-of competent enough to pull off such tasks at all.
- mixmastamyk 5y agoA little too literal IMHO. No reason a floss mobile os can’t exist. Android proves Linux is technically capable.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoI agree. Based on what I saw those that want to move either have or are exploring their options already. Average user is perfectly content with what they have, because it requires zero new knowledge and zero extra work. Linux is still anything but that. edit: Come to think of it. It is a good thing. Web became mainstream and see what happened to it.