4 ms·

I am expressing my opinion. In the last few years I noticed this "fashion" spread through blogosphere. Does it exist a single long period during human evolution

by ubojan 15y ago

I am expressing my opinion. In the last few years I noticed this "fashion" spread through blogosphere. Does it exist a single long period during human evolution when people stand in place for 40 hours a week? As far as I know most of the time people spent lying, then sitting/squatting, walking and running. You really get to stand in one place when there is no other option available. But to each his own I guess.

ideaoverload 15y ago
Does it exist a single long period during human evolution when people stand in place for 40 hours a week What about period when people sat 40 hours a week at the desk? It didn't happen either.
- ubojan 15y ago
  As far as I know, before agricultural and industrial revolution, people in hunter gatherer societies spend a majority of their time resting. They spent maybe 4-5 hours a day on hunting, gathering and other stuff. The rest of the day is spent with family and napping/lying/resting. To answer your question I think that sitting 8 hours every day is not very healthy, but it's far better than standing 8 hours. Break long period of sitting with some walking, stretching or some light exercise, and you would eliminate almost all negative effects of prolonged sitting.
darklajid 15y ago
I think the difference here is that you imagine people standing still for 8 hours straight. Obviously that would be a bad idea. No one seems to promote that. One part of the 'more healthy' claim I've read about is that you're bound to move a lot more if you're standing. You'll shift weight more. You might wander off for a second, thinking. It comes more natural instead of lifting your rear out of a comfy chair.
- ubojan 15y ago
  I know a lot of people that have jobs with requirements to stand almost all the time. All of them prefer and would like to have a job where they would be allowed to sit. And a bunch of them have a problems with veins in legs after years spent in standing positions. Of course it can't be healthy to sit 8 hours straight without some pause for walking or stretching. Combine that with some exercises 2-3 times a week and you would eliminate almost all of the health problems related with sitting.
- nosequel 15y ago
  "I think the difference here is that you imagine people standing still for 8 hours straight. Obviously that would be a bad idea. No one seems to promote that." Why is that obviously bad? I stand for 9-10 hours straight. It took probably two weeks to get up to that point, but I rarely even sit down when taking a lunch break. I don't use a gel pad and I stand barefoot at home, or in some form of barefoot (vivo's to look nice) when I worked in a office. I almost constantly shift my weight. And every 10-20 minutes I do calf raises, stand on one foot, do free squats, something to move some blood. I'm still standing in all of those exercises though and most are just second nature. I stand still while typing, but move quite a bit when I'm reading.

by ubojan 15y ago

ideaoverload 15y ago

Does it exist a single long period during human evolution when people stand in place for 40 hours a week What about period when people sat 40 hours a week at the desk? It didn't happen either.

ubojan 15y ago
As far as I know, before agricultural and industrial revolution, people in hunter gatherer societies spend a majority of their time resting. They spent maybe 4-5 hours a day on hunting, gathering and other stuff. The rest of the day is spent with family and napping/lying/resting. To answer your question I think that sitting 8 hours every day is not very healthy, but it's far better than standing 8 hours. Break long period of sitting with some walking, stretching or some light exercise, and you would eliminate almost all negative effects of prolonged sitting.

darklajid 15y ago

I think the difference here is that you imagine people standing still for 8 hours straight. Obviously that would be a bad idea. No one seems to promote that. One part of the 'more healthy' claim I've read about is that you're bound to move a lot more if you're standing. You'll shift weight more. You might wander off for a second, thinking. It comes more natural instead of lifting your rear out of a comfy chair.

ubojan 15y ago
I know a lot of people that have jobs with requirements to stand almost all the time. All of them prefer and would like to have a job where they would be allowed to sit. And a bunch of them have a problems with veins in legs after years spent in standing positions. Of course it can't be healthy to sit 8 hours straight without some pause for walking or stretching. Combine that with some exercises 2-3 times a week and you would eliminate almost all of the health problems related with sitting.
nosequel 15y ago
"I think the difference here is that you imagine people standing still for 8 hours straight. Obviously that would be a bad idea. No one seems to promote that." Why is that obviously bad? I stand for 9-10 hours straight. It took probably two weeks to get up to that point, but I rarely even sit down when taking a lunch break. I don't use a gel pad and I stand barefoot at home, or in some form of barefoot (vivo's to look nice) when I worked in a office. I almost constantly shift my weight. And every 10-20 minutes I do calf raises, stand on one foot, do free squats, something to move some blood. I'm still standing in all of those exercises though and most are just second nature. I stand still while typing, but move quite a bit when I'm reading.