4 ms·
Is it? Seeing how quickly European countries were to suspend the AstraZeneca vaccine I only see evidence of the opposite.
by CorrectHorseBat 5y ago
Is it? Seeing how quickly European countries were to suspend the AstraZeneca vaccine I only see evidence of the opposite.
- shills_run_hn 5y agoYou are confusing a signal that showed up in VAERS and similar systems based on voluntary reporting, and a signal that never showed up, because the reporting was not strict. So the system is kind of rigged to never show up with evidence of harm. Of course, they act when there is a signal that shows up, I am not sure why exactly they act, but I can think of many reasons, plausible deniability being one of them, like the observation that you are making, or maybe the people who are watching VAERS are acting in good faith (but it begs the question why any of the reports based on VAERS data does not take the massive under-reporting into account, and there is no strong voices to advocate for strictly mandated reporting)
- hills_run_hn 5y agoYou are confusing a signal that showed up in VAERS and similar systems based on voluntary reporting, and a signal that never showed up, because the reporting was not strict. So the system is kind of rigged to never show up with evidence of harm. Of course, they act when there is a signal that shows up, I am not sure why exactly they act, but I can think of many reasons, plausible deniability being one of them, like the observation that you are making, or maybe the people who are watching VAERS are acting in good faith (but it begs the question why any of the reports based on VAERS data does not take the massive under-reporting into account, and there is no strong voices to advocate for strictly mandated reporting)