2 ms·
I mean, okay, it's the program's fault. But it is part of the trade-off you make using musl, and one that I, personally, wouldn't decide in its favor. As the u
by faho 5y ago
I mean, okay, it's the program's fault. But it is part of the trade-off you make using musl, and one that I, personally, wouldn't decide in its favor.
As the user, you have the choice to use musl and "battle quite a few portability issues" (whether that's the program's fault or not!) or to use glibc and not have to battle. If the benefits of musl outweigh that in your opinion, then go ahead. I don't see it.
- Aissen 5y agoAgreed. People knowingly using musl usually know the benefits.