> Saying that again leads to no new insight. I would throw that one right back at you by saying.... What great insight does 200 people posting about 200 diffe

> Saying that again leads to no new insight. I would throw that one right back at you by saying.... What great insight does 200 people posting about 200 different variations of stacks provide insight about ? Diversity in stacks ? And, erm .... not much else ? Sure I guess you could try to aggregate it and look for patterns, but would that really be useful ? I'm not sure the sample of 200 or so would be big enough for it to be more than a subjective extrapolation of random answers and you certainly couldn't claim to see trends etc. in such a small sample.