I do think it's reasonable that anybody can access the court system for redress, and it's reasonable that the little guy can collectively organize to make that

I do think it's reasonable that anybody can access the court system for redress, and it's reasonable that the little guy can collectively organize to make that more feasible to have successful outcomes against large powerful individuals and organizations. How do you arrive at the conclusion that it is really not good overall? I don't see what you mean. But you can bet your bottom dollar those organizations would be the first to launch legal action against the little guy if they thought they were being impacted by their activity, so what's the problem with action in the other direction?