So far to the peer review, I guess there is a calculation error in model 3 (previously infected vs. previously infected with a single dose vaccine): > ... we f

So far to the peer review, I guess there is a calculation error in model 3 (previously infected vs. previously infected with a single dose vaccine): > ... we found that the latter group had a significant 0.53-fold (95% CI, 0.3 to 0.92) (Table 4a) decreased risk for reinfection, as 20 had a positive RT-PCR test, compared to 37 in the previously infected and unvaccinated group. Symptomatic disease was present in 16 single dose vaccinees and in 23 of their unvaccinated counterparts. 20/37=0.54, not 0.53... ;-)