The work that most (even highly skilled) people do is more like playing chess or writing a novel than proving theorems. Not pushing the boundaires of human kno

The work that most (even highly skilled) people do is more like playing chess or writing a novel than proving theorems. Not pushing the boundaires of human knowledge, but requiring skills which are not easily learned without experience and within which there is a huge variation in human ability. Can you really say that the existence of an agent (or a million) matching or exceeding the 100th percentile in many different skills would not be a massive change?