Have you seen peer review catch issues in papers you've submitted? Of the papers I've submitted, exactly one received a quality peer review. The rest were nons

Have you seen peer review catch issues in papers you've submitted? Of the papers I've submitted, exactly one received a quality peer review. The rest were nonsense. Both accepted and rejected papers clearly weren't read. All incentives align to giving a paper a quick skim and being done with it. NIPS showed the process is indistinguishable from noise in an experiment a few years back. It's like QA testing with a six-sided die.