4 ms·
It is not presumptuous. The very human is the one pondering about this 'truth': it very well relates to him as the 'nature' of the Universe contains man within
by omarchowdhury 15y ago
It is not presumptuous. The very human is the one pondering about this 'truth': it very well relates to him as the 'nature' of the Universe contains man within it, does it not? So whatever nature the Universe follows, so does man.
If it were the case that there are multiple parallel futures, then we ask ourselves:
How do I navigate myself to the best-possible future for me and those who surround me?
It is your very actions day by day that determine where it is that you go.
- ugh 15y agoSo whatever nature the Universe follows, so does man. Sure, but that doesn’t mean that humans are able to understand nature in a way that relates to them, at least not on all levels. We weren’t built for large and small scales, our brain is only intuitively familiar with human scales. A second to a century. One millimeter to 100 kilometer. A few centimeters per day to a few dozen kilometers per hour. I don’t think intuitiveness should be a deciding factor when it comes to describing nature.
- omarchowdhury 15y ago"Doesn't mean that humans are able to understand.." I guess all of the work in physics, chemistry and other sciences of the past thousands years was all in delusion? Nothing was learned, nothing.
- ugh 15y agoYou are missing half a sentence there. It looks like humans are very capable of understanding non-human-scale nature, just not intuitively.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]