Eh, sort of, but that'll be a whole other research effort. A lot of the maps exist already at least. But I think the way to encourage reducing waste and captur

Eh, sort of, but that'll be a whole other research effort. A lot of the maps exist already at least. But I think the way to encourage reducing waste and capturing waste to be in financial competition is that if capture costs $100/ton you charge a $90/ton tax so that your efforts are 90% funded already ($400B of the $500B) if they just paid the tax and changed nothing, while if they dropped their emissions in half they'd save $55/ton relative to a competitor that did nothing. But at least there is still an actual plan for the commons built in. But I like that it sets a benchmark for what carbon pricing needs to be to provide a real incentive to stop emitting it.