4 ms·
Well you are hearing your own rambling imaginations and tangents then, because I have not said anything related to that conclusion you are drawing. You have com
by artificialLimbs 5y ago
Well you are hearing your own rambling imaginations and tangents then, because I have not said anything related to that conclusion you are drawing. You have completely misinterpreted and I don't believe this comment to be "in good faith", so I will refrain from further.
- SketchySeaBeast 5y agoYou're right that I was overly aggressive in my argument, and for that I apologize, but that questions were asked with genuine curiosity. Please explain the nuance to me - if the only way to enforce rights is "guns" and "If someone is unwilling to defend their self, then that is their problem, and hopefully not the problem of others." then people don't have rights, they have no guarantee, they only have what they can take or defend by force, and force is the only deciding factor. What am I misinterpreting there?