3 ms·
I'm surprised this is even close to economical. In general you'd have a big chemical advantage with a higher concentration of CO2 (i.e. on top of a smokestack).
by ProjectArcturis 5y ago
I'm surprised this is even close to economical. In general you'd have a big chemical advantage with a higher concentration of CO2 (i.e. on top of a smokestack). But you also need to be close to a cheap source of clean power. I guess Iceland is one of the few places on earth where this can be done.
- ec109685 5y agoWould running carbon capture during times of excess renewable power pencil out?
- ProjectArcturis 5y agoEconomically that might be a niche where energy is nearly free. Environmentally, it seems like a better use of that energy than what it's currently being used for, which is bitcoin mining.