3 ms·
Thanks for this detailed answer. I'm lucky that I don't have to work two jobs, am a native English speaker etc., and this definitely isn't easy for many parent
by rahimnathwani 5y ago
Thanks for this detailed answer.
I'm lucky that I don't have to work two jobs, am a native English speaker etc., and this definitely isn't easy for many parents in tough circumstances.
What I don't understand: how is it that school districts spend so much money, yet can't teach kindergarteners to read?
If I wanted to run a kindergarten class of 30 kids, where the kids were looked after all day, and taught to read by the end of the year (36 weeks), then I'd need:
1) A space to teach them, with furniture ($2k/week?, i.e. $72k total).
2) Three adults ($75k/year each?, so $225k total).
3) Some books ($3k?).
That would cost $300k, or $10k per student per year. This is less than many school districts spend per child.
With that setup, at any time, you could have:
1 adult conducting a 1:1 reading lesson
2 adults keeping the other 29 kids occupied
Each kid would get 4 x 15 min reading lessons per week. So, even if they were to be absent for 30% of the school year, they would still have plenty of time for 100 lessons.
What am I missing? Is there other important stuff they do in kindergarten, that could not be covered well if you were to set things up this way?
- Anisa_Mirza 5y agoIn fairness, schools spend approx $14k per student per year. So, your spend numbers are not far off. Unfortunately, even with that level of spend, school teachers are not paid nearly as much in salary! Of course there are many other inefficiencies that need improvement as well. But I know you already know that. I like how you approach this though!