Even searching for case law and public policy on this subject causes a chilling "WARNING CHILD ABUSE IMAGERY IS ILLEGAL" box to display on google. Speaking out

Even searching for case law and public policy on this subject causes a chilling "WARNING CHILD ABUSE IMAGERY IS ILLEGAL" box to display on google. Speaking out enough on this gets you called a pedo. I will not go as far to claim that the people for this are intentionally using children to shield themselves from criticism push out a universal surveillance mechanism. ... but if you wanted to do exactly that, hiding behind the spectre of child abuse is exactly that. There are some hard questions we should be asking. Facebook claims to have reported some 20 million insances of child porn last year, but there were only a couple prosecutions. Are the matches fake? Is the goal really to just build a huge database of kompromat? If these images aren't a concern why are only an infinitesimal proportion of cases prosecuted?