3 ms·
For it to be the schtick that'd have to be sort of the pont of the show, but it's only a topic of discussion so long as it's made relevant by those in our socie
by beaner 5y ago
For it to be the schtick that'd have to be sort of the pont of the show, but it's only a topic of discussion so long as it's made relevant by those in our society, and even then that ignores the large diversity of guests and topics in his show.
There's nothing wrong with listening to two regular people have a conversation regardless of their qualifications for the topics they're discussing. They don't pretend to be professionals. (Hence why that quote can be said and why they can laugh about it.)
- mmrezaie 5y agoI think we all know JRE is not about two people having shit conversation. I used to listen to it since 2016. In the past couple of years, JRE is all about let's bring out what triggers the other side; no matter what the other side is all about. I have friends I have lost because of this, whom I have no idea how to respond to their messages anymore; Intelligent and educated ones. Regular people argument doesn't apply in here.
- hirvi74 5y agoI agree. He used to have interesting guest, and I felt the conversations were more organic. I quit watching a few years back because I did not enjoy the direction the podcast was going in.
- pohl 5y agoJoe is "regular people"? He's a sitcom actor. He makes a couple hundred million a year on podcast ad revenue alone. He only presents himself as a "regular" person because that's the demographic he's targeting.
- manigandham 5y agoHe does not make "hundreds of millions a year" on podcast ad revenue, that's a ridiculously high number. The entire podcast ad market is barely $1B total.
- Bud 5y agoFYI, no, he makes about an order of magnitude less than that, total, from all sources. He made $30M last year.
- usefulcat 5y agoThe trees have been refuted but the forest remains..