>This is a pretty bad article. Agreed. Dunno why he thinks this: "At the core of the notion of a superhuman intelligence — particularly the view that this int

>This is a pretty bad article. Agreed. Dunno why he thinks this: "At the core of the notion of a superhuman intelligence — particularly the view that this intelligence will keep improving itself — is the essential belief that intelligence has an infinite scale." The notion of self-improvement is both powerful and not assumed to be 'infinite'. I figure it goes like this: Q. Is AI potentially dangerous? A. Yes. Q. Will it be human-like? A. Probably not. People tend to couch these discussions as a series of anthropomorphisms.