3 ms·

That seems like a court case at least. You would need to prove there is any difference in language skill from someone with 15 years versus 35 years, otherwise i

• bachmeier 5y ago
  > That seems like a court case at least. For what? Youth is not a protected class. Discriminate against them all you want. > You would need to prove there is any difference in language skill from someone with 15 years versus 35 years, otherwise it is just an age requirement superficially disguised as a needed skill requirement Age discrimination is different from other discrimination cases. It's really hard to win, for instance[1]. The company doesn't have to prove anything. The worker would have to prove that it was explicit age discrimination. For other types of discrimination, like race, the only thing that needs to be shown is differences in outcomes. [1] https://www.nextavenue.org/what-it-takes-win-age-discrimination-suit/ https://www.nextavenue.org/what-it-takes-win-age-discriminat...