> 2) The record label are the ones who ultimately profited off the image. Did they? Seriously - would this album have sold a single fewer copies if the cover

> 2) The record label are the ones who ultimately profited off the image. Did they? Seriously - would this album have sold a single fewer copies if the cover had been a picture of a duck, or a floating Pom-Pom, or any of a million other things? To claim they profited from the photo, you’d have to prove that people bought one of the most popular albums of all time because this dudes baby parts were on the cover.