4 ms·
That doesn't mean there was consent and model release paperwork. The record company should (only slightly ironically) keep records. If they exist this case is
by TheOtherHobbes 5y ago
That doesn't mean there was consent and model release paperwork.
The record company should (only slightly ironically) keep records.
If they exist this case is going nowhere. If they don't - that might get interesting.
- patrickthebold 5y agoOne would think there'd be some kind of implied consent. It's hard to imagine a situation where a record company ends up with naked pictures of someones kid, the parent gets paid, and the parent is genuinely not ok with the pics appearing on an album cover. I agree it's more interesting if there's no consent form, but I still would hope the court would side with the record company.