4 ms·
> or pictures at all. So what? Voluntary consent is important How far are you willing to push that? Should I need to destroy photos that accidentally capture
by _jal 5y ago
> or pictures at all. So what? Voluntary consent is important
How far are you willing to push that?
Should I need to destroy photos that accidentally capture an infant in public?
Should children not get vaccine shots until they can meaningfully consent?
- dbingham 5y agoMy comment answered the vaccine shots (medical procedure). The one below mine answered the "destroy photos" - commercial use is different from incidental, personal, or news reporting in current consent laws. And that seems like the right line to draw.
- nate_meurer 5y agoSo you're proposing an entirely new legal regime around the interminably gray area of commercial activity, and it's intersection with the equally gray area of consent by children, which is currently centered on age, typically late teens for most uses? Relief in the courts would require a completely new body of common law. In the mean time, legislation would be the only way to provide compensation to victims of un-consented childhood photography. What specific ideas do you have for laws that could start to provide this relief?