4 ms·
Sure, but you ignored the part where he's ill-intended. This is obviously not bothering him given that he willingly recreated the picture in the past to milk mo
by rockbruno 5y ago
Sure, but you ignored the part where he's ill-intended. This is obviously not bothering him given that he willingly recreated the picture in the past to milk money out of it.
- DSMan195276 5y agoHow is the part I quoted related to whether he's ill-intended or not? Weren't you saying that before anybody knew it was him it was impossible for him to "suffer damage" from it? That's the part I disagree with.