I'm not arguing the merit of that. I'm arguing that you can't point to numbers and say "Look, AP is safer than humans, because in the optimal subset of conditi

I'm not arguing the merit of that. I'm arguing that you can't point to numbers and say "Look, AP is safer than humans, because in the optimal subset of conditions where AP is 'able' to drive, it does better than humans in all conditions, even ones where AP would refuse to engage".