4 ms·
> Now you might argue that there should not be a picture a a naked or not fully clothed child of any form ever on any phone No I'm definitely not arguing that.
by Grustaf 5y ago
> Now you might argue that there should not be a picture a a naked or not fully clothed child of any form ever on any phone
No I'm definitely not arguing that. I'm not American, where I live you'll sometimes see nude bathers in the city centre, and most definitely nude children on the beach.
1 in a trillion is derived from a dataset of 100 million photos, presumably a representable proportion of these were "similar images" like bathing kids.
- dathinab 5y agoGiven the problematic aspects of a "globally" available datasets and given that in many countries people are more stuck up about such thinks I highly doubt that this dataset contained a "representative proportion" given that you are more open about such thinks and take picture (in general). I.e. there can be a massive difference between a probability "over all humans" and a probability "over people of a given culture" as long as either the given culture is in a minority or underrepresented in given data. Given that people normally don't (knowingly) give out their private family photos when they know they culture is seen as "bad" by some people and this picture might be abused I think we can at least assume such culture(s) are underrepresented. Through we can't say how much that changes the probability.