> that because Apple made a false claim Apple never made a false claim. They have never anywhere stated that neuralhash makes false positives at 1 in a trilli

> that because Apple made a false claim Apple never made a false claim. They have never anywhere stated that neuralhash makes false positives at 1 in a trillion. Only that that is the rate for the system as a whole to flag accounts for review. The explicitly mention that they will vary the number of matches needed to maintain this if it turns out to be higher or lower based on images in the wild. There are good arguments against this system but most of the technical debate seems to have devolved into amplifying lies now.