3 ms·
It's not 1 in a trillion, it's MUCH higher. We are not speaking about a situation where not a "arbitrary" picture is miss-classifieds. We are speaking about a
by dathinab 5y ago
It's not 1 in a trillion, it's MUCH higher.
We are not speaking about a situation where not a "arbitrary" picture is miss-classifieds.
We are speaking about a situation where a innocent picture involving a naked or not fully clothed child is deemed similar to a non innocent picture of a naked or not fully clothed child.
Now you might argue that there should not be a picture a a naked or not fully clothed child of any form ever on any phone, but IMHO that is short sighed, discriminating and at best shows you don't know to much about the world and other cultures.
Let's list some simple reasons such a think could happen first:
- Photos meant for a doctor, or living partner to ask if something is normal or a problem. In many different ways.
- Photos of little children bathing or similar a e.g. dad sends to their mom who is currently on a business trip.
- etc.
Reasons people are less aware of is that not all countries are as stuck up about nakedness especially in the family. So it's totally normal for families that e.g. before or after taking a shower family member independent of age and gender walk through the apartment naked. Similar if you didn't got any shame about the naked body indoctrinated you might totally do thinks like visiting a "naked-beach" with your family (meeting other families and taking advantage of it often being less crowded) and in turn normal innocent beach family pictures contain naked children. And on itself that's not a problem. But with Apples approach stuff like this is like to trigger both systems Apple announced and wrongly label your while family as pedophiles...
- teekert 5y agoWhere I live some kids even play naked on normal beaches or near lakes or in their backyard, whatever. Up to 2 years old it's very normal. Within families kids and parents see each other naked up until puberty of the kids and the kids don't feel comfortable anymore. If you go to a sauna, everybody is naked. Or what if a kid gets her/his hands on a phone and takes some pics (doesn't even require unlocking the phone) by accident? The US may be one of the most up-tight countries about nakedness in general if you ask me. At the same time it's hyper sexualized and produces people like Nicky Minaj, but I guess there is still some fabric over their most "special" parts so it's ok. But oh god, what if Justin Timberlake rips it off... Pandemonium.
- Grustaf 5y agoUp to 2 years? Hold my beer, in Scandinavia 5 year olds routinely run naked on public beaches. You're not even very shocked if you see nude grownups bathing.
- Grustaf 5y ago> Now you might argue that there should not be a picture a a naked or not fully clothed child of any form ever on any phone No I'm definitely not arguing that. I'm not American, where I live you'll sometimes see nude bathers in the city centre, and most definitely nude children on the beach. 1 in a trillion is derived from a dataset of 100 million photos, presumably a representable proportion of these were "similar images" like bathing kids.
- dathinab 5y agoGiven the problematic aspects of a "globally" available datasets and given that in many countries people are more stuck up about such thinks I highly doubt that this dataset contained a "representative proportion" given that you are more open about such thinks and take picture (in general). I.e. there can be a massive difference between a probability "over all humans" and a probability "over people of a given culture" as long as either the given culture is in a minority or underrepresented in given data. Given that people normally don't (knowingly) give out their private family photos when they know they culture is seen as "bad" by some people and this picture might be abused I think we can at least assume such culture(s) are underrepresented. Through we can't say how much that changes the probability.