3 ms·

You're asking me to prove a negative. If there were any grounds for the claim, it wouldn't be a lie, but there aren't. The courts have settled it, election offi

by croon 5y ago

You're asking me to prove a negative. If there were any grounds for the claim, it wouldn't be a lie, but there aren't. The courts have settled it, election officials of both parties have settled it, and frankly basic understanding of the election system has settled it. I'md dismissing his entire argument because he doesn't have one outside of delusions. So I'll say it again, if you give me any substantive grounds for the lie, I can explain how it's wrong.

listenallyall 5y ago
The massive expansion of vote-by-mail in the 2020 presidential election, especially in many states which had not previously planned to do so, is sufficient to cast some doubt on the election's integrity. The NY Times reported on increased errors and fraud due to mailed ballots back in 2012. I am not claiming the election was stolen or that Trump should have won. What I am saying, is that when you state "Trump's lies about a rigged election", you are labeling his comments as "lies" to dismiss any discussion of the very real problems with mail-in voting. And that denial is your attempt to "dismiss some uncomfortably partial truth", just what I stated in my first comment. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-...
- croon 5y ago
  Mail-in-voting is linked to a (registered voter) person. If someone were to have voted for you (fraud), you would either not get to vote on election day, or cast a provisional ballot if it has not yet been counted, for example [0]. If this had happened at large, or really at all, there would be (thousands of) accounts of this, which there weren't. I'm labeling his lies about a rigged election as such because he specifically claims things that aren't true, demonstrably not true, or simply impossibly true. Discussing any problems with mail-in-voting is very much still possible, but entirely beside the point. [0] https://ballotpedia.org/What_happens_if_someone_votes_by_mail_and_then_tries_to_vote_in_person%3F_(2020) https://ballotpedia.org/What_happens_if_someone_votes_by_mai...

by croon 5y ago

listenallyall 5y ago

The massive expansion of vote-by-mail in the 2020 presidential election, especially in many states which had not previously planned to do so, is sufficient to cast some doubt on the election's integrity. The NY Times reported on increased errors and fraud due to mailed ballots back in 2012. I am not claiming the election was stolen or that Trump should have won. What I am saying, is that when you state "Trump's lies about a rigged election", you are labeling his comments as "lies" to dismiss any discussion of the very real problems with mail-in voting. And that denial is your attempt to "dismiss some uncomfortably partial truth", just what I stated in my first comment. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-...

croon 5y ago
Mail-in-voting is linked to a (registered voter) person. If someone were to have voted for you (fraud), you would either not get to vote on election day, or cast a provisional ballot if it has not yet been counted, for example [0]. If this had happened at large, or really at all, there would be (thousands of) accounts of this, which there weren't. I'm labeling his lies about a rigged election as such because he specifically claims things that aren't true, demonstrably not true, or simply impossibly true. Discussing any problems with mail-in-voting is very much still possible, but entirely beside the point. [0] https://ballotpedia.org/What_happens_if_someone_votes_by_mail_and_then_tries_to_vote_in_person%3F_(2020) https://ballotpedia.org/What_happens_if_someone_votes_by_mai...