4 ms·
I've seen half a dozen replies from you saying she probably has a lawyer and is trying to milk this, without a shred of evidence, other than "that's what you wo
by lawnchair_larry 15y ago
I've seen half a dozen replies from you saying she probably has a lawyer and is trying to milk this, without a shred of evidence, other than "that's what you would do."
I think presenting that theory once is more than enough - you don't have to reply to everybody with your theory.
- tptacek 15y agoAgain with the attempts to factionalize the discussion. "If you're not with her, you're against us!" It's weird. Why do you feel the need to take sides?
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- reinhardt 15y agoI don't see an attempt from the GP to factionalize the discussion, at least in the comment you replied to. But I do see an attempt from you to factualize it.
- jasonlotito 15y ago> I think presenting that theory once is more than enough It's the first time I read it. > you don't have to reply to everybody with your theory. And you didn't have to post this reply. But you did. It's almost like we can comment on things, and reply to them. If you think he's spamming, flag it. Otherwise, enjoy that his comments are at least contributing to the overall discussion, and not worthless comments bitching about constructive comments. Oh, the irony.