4 ms·
Sadly, you'd be wrong about that last one. Even in cases where they would want as few casualties as possible, I believe no military would want some "pos tech"
by bserge 5y ago
Sadly, you'd be wrong about that last one.
Even in cases where they would want as few casualties as possible, I believe no military would want some "pos tech" telling them what to do (and especially what not to do).
- Zenst 5y ago> I believe no military would want some "pos tech" telling them what to do (and especially what not to do). https://www.wired.com/story/pentagon-inches-toward-letting-ai-control-weapons/ https://www.wired.com/story/pentagon-inches-toward-letting-a... Also many an anti rocket/missile system that is automated and AI is (maybe already is in some aspects of tracking) being worked upon. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/10/7/pentagon-contemplating-role-of-ai-in-missile-defense https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/10/7/p... So whilst the step towards automated weapons of destruction does seem inevitable, there is clearly more acceptance of weapons for preventing lives ending unfairly already.