4 ms·
Did they broadcast violent and bloody content from there? Genuine question. The downside to fb/Twitter etc allowing bloody/violent content would be that you’d
by Nursie 5y ago
Did they broadcast violent and bloody content from there?
Genuine question. The downside to fb/Twitter etc allowing bloody/violent content would be that you’d get gore trolls and it would turn into /b
- baybal2 5y agoThey did. Facebook, and Twiter both have plenty of it. The enforcement is obviously very selective. The selective enforcement is much harder to prove than selective endorsement, and much sneakier at influencing the public opinion.
- pindab0ter 5y agoWhat’s “Fbtw”?
- BeFlatXIII 5y agoDownside for the Twitter/FB stockholders, for sure. Downside for everyone else? In the short term, also yes. In the long term, total upside as we all log out due to said gore trolls.
- pvaldes 5y agoThey could just close the comments for violent content that should be seen and let the still valuable testimony sink in a respectful silence.