3 ms·
Please help me understand. Isn't this the reason why the process involved a final manual review? If so, isn't the point of having identical hashes moot? Or is t
by nobrains 5y ago
Please help me understand. Isn't this the reason why the process involved a final manual review? If so, isn't the point of having identical hashes moot? Or is the point that having more identical hashes means reviewing more personal pictures manually, leading to a privacy issue?
- mns 5y agoI don't think I would trust a huge corporation with this. Plus, leaving the review to some internal classified process where some poor faceless guy needs to reach an unrealistically high quota of reviewed images per day to get his bonus, might be a bit of a risk.
- madeofpalk 5y agoit's not just internal policy - the safety vouchers will not decrypt (technically impossible) unless there are ~30 matches. It is a policy encoded in cryptography.
- zionic 5y ago"30 matches" just means you're one imgur album of adversarial images away from a swat team.