5 ms·

Also something I never thought about, the EUA appears to permit the vaccine be given "without an individual prescription for each vaccine recipient".

• jjulius 5y ago
  Forgive my ignorance here, but wasn't this already the case? Nobody has needed to get a prescription for the vaccine, just like a flu shot. Perhaps I am misunderstanding this comment?
  • sveiss 5y ago
    The precise mechanics vary on a state-by-state basis, but in a lot of cases a MD will write a blanket “prescription” that covers a class of patients, and that’s what fulfils the legal requirement for a prescription to dispense/administer a drug. In others, healthcare workers who don’t ordinarily have prescription authority are granted authority to prescribe vaccines by a state law. The “prescription” here isn’t something the patient will see or be aware of, it’s just part of how the legal requirements around dispensing medications and the logistics of vaccination providers interact. There’s some information on this from a pharmacist perspective here: https://naspa.us/resource/pharmacist-authority-to-immunize/ https://naspa.us/resource/pharmacist-authority-to-immunize/ .
  • perl4ever 5y ago
    Certainly we have been going along under an EUA, without individual prescriptions. I'm just as ignorant as you, and your point about the flu shot is a good one. I'm not aware of a prescription being required for that. But as I read the document, it implied that with a regular approval and without the EUA, a prescription would be required and so that was one of the reasons for renewing it.