4 ms·
The Principles Underlying Radio Communication
- preordained 5y agoWhat I've read of this is super readable to me. I really like the practical, matter-of-fact communication style.
- max_ 5y agoThis "Feynman" type of communication is really what should run through the education system
- mwilliaams 5y agoThe U.S. military has a lot of informative publications such as this. They’re usually pretty easy to read once you find the relevant section. Those interested in this one might also like Naval Telecommunications Procedures [1]. It has a lot of administrative and Navy-specific information, but chapter 5 covers radio communication, including satellite communication (unclassified of course). Edit: The Naval Electricity and Electronics Training Series (NEETS) [2] is good as well. 1. https://info.publicintelligence.net/USNavy-NTP4E.pdf https://info.publicintelligence.net/USNavy-NTP4E.pdf 2. https://www.hnsa.org/manuals-documents/2575-2/ https://www.hnsa.org/manuals-documents/2575-2/
- mindcrime 5y agoOn a related note, the Federation of American Scientists maintains a really fascinating archive of unclassified military documents, which includes a lot of this kind of stuff (plus all sorts of other interesting documents). I think their archive tends towards slightly newer documents though. Or maybe I just haven't skimmed it thoroughly enough. https://irp.fas.org/doddir/ https://irp.fas.org/doddir/
- PaulAJ 5y agoA "pamphlet" with 636 pages!
- vymague 5y agoReminds me of Dover textbooks.
- hilbert42 5y agoDo you mean the MIT Radiation Laboratory/Rad Lab series that came out after WWII? Many of these were issued in Dover edition books. I still have some and still refer to them (especially vol 23 — Microwave Receivers/S. N. Van Voorhis/1948). https://web.mit.edu/klund/www/weblatex/node7.html https://web.mit.edu/klund/www/weblatex/node7.html https://archive.org/details/mit-rad-lab-series-version-3 https://archive.org/details/mit-rad-lab-series-version-3
- vymague 5y agoJust general physics/math Dover reprints. They share similar style to the one OP posted.
- hilbert42 5y agoYeah, it's interesting to see the original 1948 publications. My uni library had a set but for some reason the covers were a reddy-brown color. All my Dover reprints are softcover and had new designs on the front. Even now, decades after I first encountered it, I find the scope and breadth of this Rad Lab series quite mindboggling. What was achieved by Fredrick Terman, Vannevar Bush et al between 1941-45 was truly remarkable. Shame the series isn't better known these days as it documents a true milestone in engineering history.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- tempodox 5y ago(1922)
- Koshkin 5y agoThe "principles" probably haven't changed that much; but those were indeed exciting times to be involved in tech, even as an amateur. (Today it's mostly about microcontrollers, MicroPython, sensors, IOT, and robotics.)
- mindcrime 5y ago(Today it's mostly about microcontrollers, MicroPython, sensors, IOT, and robotics.) Not that that stuff isn't exciting in its own right. :-)
- lebuffon 5y agoFor perspective the first commercial radio station in the USA went on the air in late 1920. It was a societal revolution in information speed versus the telegraph->newspaper mode which was in itself a revolution. I often wonder how many lay people understand that wifi, cell phone, GPS etc are "radio" communication.
- sponaugle 5y agoRelated to this - https://www.edn.com/understanding-electromagnetic-fields-and-antenna-radiation-takes-almost-no-math/ https://www.edn.com/understanding-electromagnetic-fields-and... It is an excellent short article that addresses a few key areas of how EM radiation is created.
- rramadass 5y agoVery nice article. FYI - The author of the article has also written a longer book expanding on the above theme named Electromagnetics Explained: A Handbook for Wireless/ RF, EMC, and High-Speed Electronics.
- xyzzy21 5y agoI have the hardcover version of this book. Good book. Also an example of how older books are better written for a broader audiences than most technical books today. It really shouldn't be that hard but it is. Basically today they are written for the author's own ego or for a small elite group of peers and NOT for anyone with more modest knowledge. Pretty much a waste of time writing at all in many cases. I think people has broader education plus only top-flight people went to college so that resulted in similar broader abilities like simply writing well and having clear ideas and explanations. This is why I have nearly as many books written before 1950 as written after. The best explanations come from older books written long ago.