3 ms·
> Maybe I'm just cynical but I have a hard time believing that it was because everyone just _had_ to have a TV with a buggy UI (in many cases) and/or loaded wit
by tshaddox 5y ago
> Maybe I'm just cynical but I have a hard time believing that it was because everyone just _had_ to have a TV with a buggy UI (in many cases) and/or loaded with spyware.
As you indicated, dumb TVs did compete against smart TVs for many years. The options were more like:
1. Buy a smart TV that might contain spyware and bugs.
2. Buy a dumb TV, and also buy another device to play content which can just as easily contain spyware and bugs. Oh, and the dumb TV already costs the same as the smart TV, because the "smart" hardware is extremely cheap at scale even without any secondary revenue streams.
- ikr678 5y agoBeing able to update the secondary device (with or without bugs) independent of the tv screen is a better upgrade path. How long will tv manufacturers be supporting and providing updates to smart tv software? If the smart components in the tv bug out or get bricked, you need a whole new tv.