4 ms·
Perhaps, but 10 years ago you didn't have viable competitors with pure or near-pure camera based self-driving systems. Now we have little lightly funded comp
by WatchDog 5y ago
Perhaps, but 10 years ago you didn't have viable competitors with pure or near-pure camera based self-driving systems.
Now we have little lightly funded companies like comma producing quite compelling experiences using cheap hardware.
Not to mention tesla with near-unlimited funding, leading the way in the space.
- ahahahahah 5y agocomma.ai is a joke. nobody in the industry thinks about them because they are so far from viability. the idea of tesla having unlimited funding is a joke. They are barely spending across r&d for the whole company. what portion of their r&d is dedicated to self-driving do you thing? even if 100% is self-driving it's still less than the real players in the space.
- WatchDog 5y agoTesla have access to boat loads of capital in the public markets, they are spending heaps on AI, developing their own silicon, not only for the cars, but for their training computer as well. Who are the real players in the space? There might be bigger players focused more on general AI, but Tesla seem like the biggest player by far, focused on automotive mainly.