3 ms·
For goodness sake, it's a company, there are plenty of places it could put the facilities, it could simply relocate to another one without a road in the middle
by gregoriol 5y ago
For goodness sake, it's a company, there are plenty of places it could put the facilities, it could simply relocate to another one without a road in the middle (or a beach)
- verdverm 5y agoOrbital rocket companies have far fewer options. They want to be as south as possible with nothing but water for quite a ways. That basically leaves CA, FL, and TX with two having ideal launch sites that SpaceX was already using.
- BitwiseFool 5y agoRight? And I cannot use the beach next to naval facilities and harbors. So clearly there is a precedent for disallowing beach access near something important that has to be on the coast. There's also plenty of other beaches nearby.
- thehappypm 5y ago"Something important" means something our democratically elected government is in charge of, not something run by a private company.
- BitwiseFool 5y agoPlenty of private companies restrict beach access. Power plants, water treatment facilities, harbors.
- gregoriol 5y agoThis is less and less accepted nowadays though