4 ms·
I think that autodiscovery is only finding the first feed. Since you’re aggregating feeds, I’d expect it to find all feeds on all pages. Sample page with multip
by chrismorgan 5y ago
I think that autodiscovery is only finding the first feed. Since you’re aggregating feeds, I’d expect it to find all feeds on all pages. Sample page with multiple feeds: https://chrismorgan.info/blog/tags/fun/ https://chrismorgan.info/blog/tags/fun/ has the site-wide feed and then the tag-specific feed. I say only “I think” at the start of this comment because the entries in the second feed are a subset of the entries in the first, though it has a different feed ID and title, and I can imagine it possibly merging them.
Losing formatting makes me a little bit sad. The widespread idea that titles are necessarily plain unformatted text is just bad. Italics especially are very regularly useful.
- amadeuspagel 5y ago> I think that autodiscovery is only finding the first feed. Yes. > Since you’re aggregating feeds, I’d expect it to find all feeds on all pages. No, I don't think that would be useful. For example, a lot of blogs have autodiscovery for a feed of all posts and for a feed of all comments on their homepage. But if I want to create a multifeed of several blogs, I only want the posts. Generally, the way I expect autodiscovery to work is that a link to the most specific applicable feed comes first. For example on the page for the tag "fun", the feed for the tag fun should come first, because that's most likely what people are looking for on that page. If they wanted the general feed, they'd go to the homepage.