3 ms·
Good question. I'm guessing we should at least see some improvement pathname library C rewrite. But I can't tell if the require fix made it into 1.9.3. For con
by stephth 15y ago
Good question. I'm guessing we should at least see some improvement pathname library C rewrite. But I can't tell if the require fix made it into 1.9.3.
For context:
http://www.rubyinside.com/ruby-1-9-3-faster-loading-times-require-4927.html http://www.rubyinside.com/ruby-1-9-3-faster-loading-times-re...
- petercooper 15y agoI can confirm that yes, the load.c patch as outlined in the Ruby Inside post IS in Ruby 1.9.3 preview 1 :-)