6 ms·
Agreed. Actual benchmarks prove that there isn't a difference in load times between SATA and NVMe SSDs for somewhat modern games, much less RAM disks: https://
by theandrewbailey 5y ago
Agreed. Actual benchmarks prove that there isn't a difference in load times between SATA and NVMe SSDs for somewhat modern games, much less RAM disks:
https://www.pcgamer.com/anthem-load-times-tested-hdd-vs-ssd-vs-nvme/ https://www.pcgamer.com/anthem-load-times-tested-hdd-vs-ssd-...
https://hardforum.com/threads/nvme-m-2-ram-drive-raid-sata-iii-ssd-game-load-time-comparisons.1911914/ https://hardforum.com/threads/nvme-m-2-ram-drive-raid-sata-i...
Like you said about requiring a bunch of processing, DirectStorage[0] should be able to skip a lot of processing when loading from NVMe. I haven't read that DirectStorage works with RAM disks, but even if it was, there might not be a difference in load times between them. You'd be better off buying more NVMe than RAM, if game load times are your only use case for a RAM drive.
[0] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/directstorage-is-coming-to-pc/ https://devblogs.microsoft.com/directx/directstorage-is-comi...
- ksec 5y ago>DirectStorage[0] Exactly. The reason why they don't shown any difference is because games are not optimised for it yet. PS5 and Xbox now set the baseline for storage standard there will be lots of work going into that.