3 ms·
out of curiosity, why do you maintain a catch all? would it not be easier (and less of a privacy issue) to just reject them outright?
by gnyman 5y ago
out of curiosity, why do you maintain a catch all? would it not be easier (and less of a privacy issue) to just reject them outright?
- bartkappenburg 5y agoIt has a business reason: we let customers email each other on an anonymized email address ($hash@kamer.nl) to keep their info private. I know the structure of the hash (length etc) but no clue how to filter on the mail-server side using this characteristic, that’s why a catch-all. We’re thinking of sunsetting the feature and that would mean that a catch-all won’t be necessary anymore :-)