3 ms·
Surely this is just moving the goal posts. If they can launch in Chandler and in San Francisco then a huge amount of the contiguous United States is on the tabl
by bobsomers 5y ago
Surely this is just moving the goal posts. If they can launch in Chandler and in San Francisco then a huge amount of the contiguous United States is on the table.
- fnord77 5y agomany places have fairly strong summer storms. SF does not. Also it looks like it almost never rains in Chandler. we won't have all-weather reliable level 4/5 until an onboard computer has the equivalent power of a human brain
- jsight 5y agoI completely agree. I was pretty critical of them when they were just a tiny slice of Arizona, but going from n to n+1 is really major progress. The fact that the +1 is a city as complex as SF is a really good sign as well. If they can handle SF, they can handle Charlotte, Atlanta, LA, and many other major metros just as "easily". I'm a lot more optimistic for their rollout now.
- TameAntelope 5y agoNope, not even close. There's a very specific reason they've picked Chandler, and it's that there's relatively little weather and the roads are fairly simple (among many other things specific to Chandler). The vast majority of the contiguous United States is decidedly not "on the table" as of now. "The contiguous United States" is still a decade (or more) away. It may literally never happen.
- bobsomers 5y ago> The vast majority of the contiguous United States is decidedly not "on the table" as of now. So the vast majority of the US has either significantly worse weather than SF, or a significantly harder ODD than SF? Could you elaborate on that?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jdavis703 5y agoIt generally doesn’t snow in SF or Chandler. I personally like snow, so I wouldn’t describe that weather as significantly worse. But my understanding is snow makes it hard for lane keeping, and then there’s all sorts of edge cases like streets that aren’t plowed and require special driving techniques, people placing cones to reserve parking spaces, etc.
- nr2x 5y agoThis is why I wouldn't be surprised if they choose Pittsburgh next.
- pchristensen 5y agoI feel like San Francisco is a good progression - still generally good weather, but much more crowded, more traffic, more special cases, pedestrians and bikes, one-way roads, topography, limited visibility due to hills and no-setback buildings, construction, buses, etc. It's a significant leap in urban complexity, probably greater than 98% of the rest of the USA. Regarding the weather, lots of people have mentioned snow, but much of the Midwest, Northeast, and especially the South can have sudden torrential rain. I haven't researched it but I would guess that a Florida rainstorm would be hard for both radar and visual guidance. I predict their next city will be Orlando, in partnership with Disney. Then somewhere like Boston (harder - older street pattern and more snow) or Philadelphia (easier). Each of those 3 would "unlock" new territory they can cover. I predict that NYC will be one of the last areas "unlocked".
- TameAntelope 5y agoNo sorry, the vast majority of the US has significantly worse weather and/or more complex traffic than Chandler, AZ. I didn't make any statements about SF traffic or weather.