7 ms·
“It’s important for us to own the customer,” Forssell told me last week. “If the viewer is in the app, we can tailor the home page to them. We can tailor what t
by dazc 5y ago
“It’s important for us to own the customer,” Forssell told me last week. “If the viewer is in the app, we can tailor the home page to them. We can tailor what they show them next. We can respond to that in real time.”
Not sure I agree with this since I can not recall a single instance where I have wanted to watch anything that has been suggested to me. All platforms have a limited amount of good stuff that I will happily search for and a huge amount of junk that I am simply not interested in.
Managing individual subscriptions is a real pain and I would prefer to find everything I need on one platform thanks.
- ignoramous 5y agoI believe this behaviour is endemic to companies trying to morph into a "tech company" with MBAs leading the charge. > Customer intimacy. Modern tech companies collect, store, organize, and analyze years of user data. This data is virtual gold, as it enables companies to run targeted ads and personalize the customer experience. The key difference between a customer walking into a Walmart supercenter and Amazon's online store is that Amazon instantaneously reorganizes the whole store (layout, displays, product offerings, etc.) in a way that's tailormade for that customer. https://archive.is/wK1bC https://archive.is/wK1bC (why wework is not a tech company, hbr.org, 2019) https://archive.is/G7rSR https://archive.is/G7rSR (why zomato.com is a tech company, hbr.org, 2021)
- rottencupcakes 5y agoThe irony there is I have never ever bought anything because Amazon recommended it. Amazon is better than Walmart because you can search for and buy what you want when you want and have it show up the next day, and the prices are generally good enough. Reviews are a nice touch, but those just need to be “good enough” to differentiate cheap chinese crap. It’s not rocket science.
- gogopuppygogo 5y agoBezos at one time mentioned that 35% of all Amazons sales came from recommendations. That’s not an insignificant number.
- mywittyname 5y agoBut, are those recommendations based on what you're looking at? I could definitely see users purchasing one of the recommended items if they come to the site with an item in mind, but not necessarily a brand. I often come to Amazon and search for something like "washers" and skim through the "recommended" items until I find a pack that's a good value. But from an attribution standpoint, that sale is more the result of "browsing the aisle" than a recommendation. It's not like they recommended hairspray, which i bought in addition to the thing I came there to buy.
- dnadler 5y agoAgreed. I think highly contextualized recommendations are the most helpful. As another example, I frequently find the "often purchased together" section to be very helpful. That might be the only recommendation system that I've ever used more than once. I would say that's an example of recommendations working. However, in my personal experience, I rarely find "general" recommendations helpful.
- pfranz 5y agoI wonder what specifically Bezos meant? Similarly, I often search for something specific and see "sponsored" results that are what I was searching for, with the same item right below it as part of the organic search results. Or, I'll browse for items, then come back to purchase it later seeing it under "recently viewed." Do those count? If so, I purchase recommended things all the time. If not, I don't think I've ever bought something they organically offered on their main page with 20 years of purchase and browsing history. Looking at the recommendations right now, they're not very good. Maybe I'm a hard sell? Sure, sidewalk chalk. You might run out of that and want more. Stuff to rekey your lock. I needed that when I bought my house a few years ago...I'm not sure why I would need that now. An air conditioner support bracket. I bought one last year much earlier in the summer.
- Brian_K_White 5y agoThe entire isle was constructed on the fly just for you, including all the items you "compared", and their prices, and the thing you eventually "picked".
- thesausageking 5y agoTech companies play this game as well. This has always been a core part of Netflix's pitch: our recommendations will keep users tied to the platform and also reduce the cost to acquire IP as we can always find something the user is interested in. I used to believe their pitch. However, it doesn't seem like it ended up working. People hear about a show and want to watch that specific show. The recommendations only do so much.
- pempem 5y agoInteresting. I would disagree. They've shifted from supremely niche recommendations ("British murder mysteries during wwII") to everyone watching the entirety tiger king within the same 2 wk period and a coarse grain search for british titles not even providing an exhaustive list. If anything they have taken recommendations and remade them in their own image/strategy/goals rather than our personalized watching behavior. Great examples continue to be Bridgerton, the Office which then had a meme-based resurgence, that one with Kevin Spacey, etc.
- thesausageking 5y agoYou're agreeing with me. When they were serving up niche recommendations it was an intentional business decision. If they could convince people to watch niche things, it reduces their IP costs as those things are cheaper to license and they're also in a stronger bargaining position as they don't need any one specific show. What happened is consumers didn't agree. People wanted to watch the Office, not another feel-good comedy Netflix recommended. That forced Netflix to abandon their original strategy and spend a lot more on content.
- ethbr0 5y agoI just think they don't really care. They care about retention, but they've realized that content >> discoverability for that. People will find out about content. What they will not do is watch bad content, no matter how specifically and accurately it speaks to them.
- z3t4 5y agoGold is knowing what the customer wants/needs because then you can actually sell them something. But I doubt any amount of "data" will be able to figure that out.
- syshum 5y ago>> with MBAs leading the charge. So at what point on the MBA path does a person get forced into removing the logic part of the their brain? MBA's seems to make decisions that are using an alien form that non-MBA's can not seem to understand, and perceive as illogical.....
- pempem 5y agoBecause MBAs will always hold two items in tension: profit and user desire. If these two items are out of whack, an MBA will always favor profit and that too in incredibly creative, often marketing-based ways that rethink the business model. They will convince the user of what they need the user to believe to make the largest possible profit. ICs often think of profit and user needs/desire but they usually hunt for a place where it overlaps and if it doesn't, they'll hunt again. Profit is demanded for value/convenience to the customer but it is often a 1:1 relationship.
- e40 5y agoI believe this behaviour is endemic to companies trying to morph into a "tech company" with MBAs leading the charge. They're also going to pocket Amazon's fee.
- paulcole 5y ago> Not sure I agree with this since I can not recall a single instance where I have wanted to watch anything that has been suggested to me. Does this tell you that: • HBO is wrong • You're not representative of either their user base or the user base they want • You don't remember the times your browsing behavior was influenced by suggestions because you like believing you're not influenced by suggestions
- davidivadavid 5y agoHere's a fun test: try to think of what you watched that was not suggested to you one way or another. Think of what it would even mean.
- reaperducer 5y agoThe vast majority of the shows I watch I have found by searching for keywords I'm interested in, or actors who I enjoy watching, so I can come up with a pretty long list of shows I watched that were never suggested to me in one way or another.
- davidivadavid 5y agoYou type a keyword... somewhere? On Google maybe? And then what? Pick the first movie listed? What about actors? Do you watch all of their movies? In random order? Do you do it chronologically? Why? The only way you could watch movies without it being the result of a suggestion would be if you had a random list of movies (preferably of all movies ever made) and picked at random in it. I think it's safe to assume you're not doing that, so you're being suggested movies.
- Bedon292 5y agoOn the other hand, I can honestly not think of a single show or movie that hasn't been suggested to me in one way or another. I may search for a specific show or movie, but that is either something I have already watched, or I saw an ad for somewhere along the line.
- 5y ago
- cschep 5y ago"Advertising doesn't work on me!" If this is true, congrats. You are the .000001%. It works on people really well in the broad scope. It makes them gobs and gobs of money.
- lowkey_ 5y agoI believe advertising works on everyone; if it's really good, you just won't even be able to tell it's advertising or that it's 'working on you.'
- pdpi 5y agoAdvertising comes in many flavours, and different flavours work for different people. E.g. I find that most tech-y people I know who say "advertising doesn't work on me" are very susceptible to the "laundry-list of features" type of advertising that tricks them into thinking they're being rational and objective about their decision process, while not questioning why they should care about any of those features. For me, there's ads I actively enjoy watching. The old Cog[0] ad for the Honda Accord is one such case, as is the He-Man/Skeletor[1] ad for Money Supermarket (well, that and every other ad in that campaign). These work incredibly well on me as the brand awareness sort of marketing, and I'm sufficiently aware that I can correct for it — but I'm almost certainly unaware of my susceptibility to other sorts. 0. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ve4M4UsJQo 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PgTjhx1VLw
- SuoDuanDao 5y agoDoes it though? When's the last time it worked on you?
- parthdesai 5y agoI did buy something based off an instagram ad. I also would rather have ads that are meaningful than be shown some useless ads.
- SuoDuanDao 5y ago
- e40 5y agoThis might be OK if the HBOmax app wasn't one of the worst apps out there for video streaming. On my top-of-the-line Roku it is horrible sluggish. Comically so.
- snarf21 5y agoYeah and there are some many other choices at this point. I think a perfect startup would be a streaming manager. It creates unique passwords and handles the billing through virtual cards. You pick 6 streaming services and the system just rotates you through them, handling all the billing and cancelations. Binge watch the last year to catch-up and move on. FOMO is the other reason people have 5 services today and without the water cooler, you aren't even really not up to date.
- everdrive 5y ago>It’s important for us to own the customer Outside of how evil this sounds, I've found that recommendation engines ultimately play against my own interests. It's possible that this ultimately my own fault based on what I watch. Realistically, I think there are multiple scenarios here: - I watch some junk videos, and youtube suggests more videos like it. - I enjoy junk videos by a single youtuber, and youtube expects that I want similar sorts of junk videos from many other youtubers. (when I do not) - I enjoy junk videos of one narrow variety, but most people who enjoy those videos enjoy junk videos of a very wide variety. eg, I watch one retro games review channel, and so youtube thinks I want to watch whatever the most popular retro games review channel. More perversely, I find that part of the feedback loop here is caused by the move from searching to browsing. That is, if I am shown a list of options (ie, if I am browsing) I tend to want to pick from the available options. The options are just based on what I've watched before, and so my tastes remain narrow over time. If I have to search for content, my mind wanders more, and I think more broadly about what content might be interesting to watch. This is nearly a creative process, and it broadens my horizons. Again, I think it would be perfectly fair to claim that this is really my fault, and not youtube's fault. But, it's very reminiscent of problems with junk food, or gambling, or any other vice. Just because the blame must lie with me does not mean that the company has created something good, which benefits people. Having discovered this vice, I now do my best to avoid any product with a recommendation engine.
- Terretta 5y agoHBO are the same giant brains who, when a viewer clicks a show to watch, don’t play it. Instead they put a giant “who are you” and make you pick the profile you will watch with — even when there is only one profile and it’s the same profile you use every single time you’ve ever attempted to watch their content.
- nonameiguess 5y agoHonestly, the bigger problem to me is the HBO Max app is terrible. It constantly crashes and has all kinds of weird bugs. They're notorious for sending every customer an integration test email from a bogus domain. If you're going to insist on being a software developer as well as a content producer, fine, but make good software. Otherwise, let the experts who are actually good at it provide the distribution platform and HBO sticks to what HBO is good at, which is producing content. HBO may never have been as big as Netflix and Amazon, but as long as they had a multi-decade history of producing way better content and continued to do so, even if it was less content, they were going to remain relevant. They didn't need to eat the world. Being small but good is fine. But selling out to AT&T means they need to try and eat the world so whoever pushed the acquisition can justify it and get a bigger bonus.
- taneliv 5y agoI think advertising works slightly differently than what you think and what Forssell seems to be saying. You see once a show (or a movie) advertised. It does not really register consciously with you (assuming you are used to this kind of advertisement, and largely ignore it). You might even see it a few times, but if someone asked which advertisements you saw, you may not recall it at all. Now, a friend comes along and recommends you that same show / movie. You quite likely remember it, not consciously, but, eh, subconsciously(?). Your friend's comment is actually much more than a recommendation, it becomes reinforcement that you've encountered this show before, and it is likely popular and hence good (even if you consciously think popular things are not your thing). Next time you come to the site, you might not be looking for your friend's recommendation, just something else. However, it might just so happen that this particular show is being advertised to you. Even if you were to click on it, you don't think the site was advertising it to you. Your friend did! It just happened to be there. Conveniently, you didn't even have to search for it. Now, that single platform thing. I would love that, too. Better yet, if they would also be forced to keep historical movies and shows from 1900-2000 in their catalogue, kind of a public service. However, they would also own the incredibly powerful advertisement channel called "Shows you might like." Or your friend might like, but anyways.