I hope this gets taken to court and this company gets shut down. I'm not a patent (or any other kind of) lawyer but I do hold a couple of patents and I feel so

I hope this gets taken to court and this company gets shut down. I'm not a patent (or any other kind of) lawyer but I do hold a couple of patents and I feel some confidence reading it, that CSP would not be held to breach this patent for a couple of reasons: Firstly the patent describes a method of preventing cross-site scripting attacks by using preshared secrets which it describes throughout as passwords. A client-side "filter" is described in the invention, which disables "untrusted" sources unless they know the secret. The owner of a site turning on CSP can't possibly be violating the patent because the filtering in both the invention and the real CSP implementation happens at the client. The patent would have to cover the method of generating or publishing the nonces for the site owner to be in violation. If anyone is violating the patent (and I don't believe anyone is) it would be the people who make browsers which use the CSP headers to decide whether or not to execute script code. It also describes various systems ("unsafe function" rewriting, etc) which don't exist in CSP and instead focuses purely on the idea that a nonce is a preshared secret password which can be checked by a "filter" on the client side.