4 ms·
You may have a misunderstanding here. Neovim, while it is a ground up rewrite of vim, didn't break people's configs. The team made it a point to maintain backwa
by DerArzt 5y ago
You may have a misunderstanding here. Neovim, while it is a ground up rewrite of vim, didn't break people's configs. The team made it a point to maintain backwards compatibility while positioning themselves to be able to move towards using lua as their config language.
- blacktriangle 5y agoExcept the specific rewrite the op was talking about was moving from elisp to scheme. It's one thing to support a limited language like vimscript, it's a whole other thing to reproduce the semantics of elisp in scheme.
- pritambaral 5y agoYes, but then Vimscript wasn't a very good language; whereas Lua, Python (and many others Neovim enabled support for) are great languages. The benefit of a much better language is enticing; making a language much better than Emacs Lisp, however, is not so easy.